<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Urban Legends Revealed #19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/</link>
	<description>For unbelievable true stories about movies, TV and films (and more!) and believable false ones!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-16878</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-16878</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s crazy. Thanks for the info, OM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s crazy. Thanks for the info, OM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OM</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-16830</link>
		<dc:creator>OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-16830</guid>
		<description>...From my own experience with the local See-BS affiliate, I can confirm that the reasons Meg Foster was ousted from &lt;I&gt;Cagney &amp; Lacy&lt;/i&gt; was due to the show being perceived as &quot;too dykish&quot; or &quot;too butch&quot;. I&#039;ve read some of the inter-affiliate memos between station heads over the matter, and the real surprise was that not all of them agreed with See-BS&#039; decision. The shocker was that the suits running the San Francisco affiliate *were* in favor of it, considering that at the time Frisco had become the &quot;de-facto&quot; homosexual capitol of the US, an irony that was not lost on the other affiliates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;From my own experience with the local See-BS affiliate, I can confirm that the reasons Meg Foster was ousted from <i>Cagney &amp; Lacy</i> was due to the show being perceived as &#8220;too dykish&#8221; or &#8220;too butch&#8221;. I&#8217;ve read some of the inter-affiliate memos between station heads over the matter, and the real surprise was that not all of them agreed with See-BS&#8217; decision. The shocker was that the suits running the San Francisco affiliate *were* in favor of it, considering that at the time Frisco had become the &#8220;de-facto&#8221; homosexual capitol of the US, an irony that was not lost on the other affiliates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-999</guid>
		<description>IMDB says it&#039;s 6.

And does anyone else find it a disturbing coincidence to see a CBS executive spewing sexist nonsense that could have come straight from the mouth of Archie Bunker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMDB says it&#8217;s 6.</p>
<p>And does anyone else find it a disturbing coincidence to see a CBS executive spewing sexist nonsense that could have come straight from the mouth of Archie Bunker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-996</guid>
		<description>I thought so, too, Jakob. The original TV Guide article said three, so I figured they knew best. But I could be wrong in trusting them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought so, too, Jakob. The original TV Guide article said three, so I figured they knew best. But I could be wrong in trusting them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakob</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-995</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only a minor point, but I think Meg Foster was in 6 episodes of Cagney and Lacey, not 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only a minor point, but I think Meg Foster was in 6 episodes of Cagney and Lacey, not 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary warner</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>mary warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Actually, because of the TV Guide article, I was confused about the definition of the word &#039;dyke&#039; for a couple of years.  I&#039;d only seen it in print a couple of times before that, and I had no idea what it meant.  I couldn&#039;t find it in the crappy bowdlerised dictionary I had.  So because of TV Guide&#039;s article, I was under the assumption that it meant some sort of militant feminist or activist.  It never occured to me that it meant lesbian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, because of the TV Guide article, I was confused about the definition of the word &#8216;dyke&#8217; for a couple of years.  I&#8217;d only seen it in print a couple of times before that, and I had no idea what it meant.  I couldn&#8217;t find it in the crappy bowdlerised dictionary I had.  So because of TV Guide&#8217;s article, I was under the assumption that it meant some sort of militant feminist or activist.  It never occured to me that it meant lesbian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-980</guid>
		<description>There was some, Daniel. I know Howard Rosenberg took them to task in the LA Times.

But there wasn&#039;t nearly as much of an uproar as there would be nowadays. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was some, Daniel. I know Howard Rosenberg took them to task in the LA Times.</p>
<p>But there wasn&#8217;t nearly as much of an uproar as there would be nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel O' Dreams</title>
		<link>http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2009/08/18/tv-legends-revealed-19/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel O' Dreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/?p=1414#comment-977</guid>
		<description>Did TV Guide actually print that? &quot;We perceived them as dykes?&quot; Was there any outrage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did TV Guide actually print that? &#8220;We perceived them as dykes?&#8221; Was there any outrage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

