{"id":5379,"date":"2013-11-20T10:10:00","date_gmt":"2013-11-20T18:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/legendsrevealed.com\/entertainment\/?p=5379"},"modified":"2020-04-04T05:15:09","modified_gmt":"2020-04-04T10:15:09","slug":"was-the-first-movie-vampire-with-fangs-not-until-the-1950s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/legendsrevealed.com\/entertainment\/2013\/11\/20\/was-the-first-movie-vampire-with-fangs-not-until-the-1950s\/","title":{"rendered":"Was the First Movie Vampire With Fangs Not Until the 1950s?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the latest in a series of examinations into urban legends about movies and whether they are true or false. Click here<\/a> to view an archive of the movie urban legends featured so far.<\/p>\n

MOVIE URBAN LEGEND<\/span><\/u>: Did Dracula (and vampires in general) not have vampire fangs in films until a Turkish film in the 1950s? <\/p>\n

We as readers and viewers of popular culture do an interesting thing that I like to call “intellectual consolidation.” When given a number of different films and shows and stories about a particular topic, whichever aspects that we deem to be the most memorable sort of end up squished together into a patchwork collective memory, whether that memory is accurate or not. I have written about this effect in the past, also in relation to a horror film, specifically the fact that there was no assistant named Igor until the third Frankenstein film<\/a> and yet now Dr. Frankenstein having an assistant named Igor is considered an integral part of the Frankenstein story. Along the same lines, it was a surprisingly long and strange journey before we saw the motion picture introduction of the classic vampire fangs we are all familiar with in the story of Dracula.
\n
\nWhile vampires (or vampyres, as they were originally spelled) existed in folklore for a number of years before the 19th Century and had even appeared in some literature, it was not until John William Polidori’s 1819 short story “The Vampyre” that we began to see a somewhat consistent depiction of vampires, especially the idea of a charming killer (in this story, the vampire’s name was Lord Ruthven). The 1845-47 serialized vampire story, “Varney the Vampire,” was the first story to actually refer to sharpened teeth for a vampire, specifically noting “With a plunge he seizes her neck in his fang-like teeth.” Of course, as you might note, the teeth were only fang-LIKE. But by the time Bram Stoker wrote the most popular vampire story of them all, 1897’s Dracula<\/em>, sharp fang-like teeth were a constant of vampire literature. <\/p>\n

But while they were a constant of vampire literature, that was not the case for depictions of vampires in stage and screen. In the case of theatrical plays, the idea of wearing fake teeth was likely just an impractical one. Who in the audience would be able to see your teeth? And if you made them big enough for people to see, well, we would be talking about teeth so big that how would you possibly be able to get your lines out? <\/p>\n

One of the first famous vampires appearing in films was F.W. Murnau’s 1922 unauthorized adaptation of Dracula, Nosferatu<\/em>, starring Max Schreck as the vampire Count Orlok. The key to the film was that Murnau did not have the rights to adapt Bram Stoker’s novel, so he instead made a point of changing things (like Count Orlok instead of Count Dracula and referring to the bad guys as “Nosferatu” instead of as a “vampire”). Along those same lines, the makeup used to make Schreck look like a vampire had to make him look different than the classic depiction of Dracula from Stoker’s novel, so Orlok had sort of rat-like incisors instead of the what we now think of as the classical vampire fangs.<\/p>\n

\"\"